This week’s question revolves around leagues which allow players to play on a travel team and a recreational team during the same season. Our league allows it and so far it’s been a good experience for the kids. They get to do this whole new ‘travel’ thing when they hit U10, but can also still play with many of the kids they’ve known since U5 swarm ball. They obviously get more ball touches and they definitely serve as role models for the other kids. As they get older, however, the level of play in Rec levels off so you find the majority of multi-rostering in the younger ages around U10 and U12.
Now for some parents and players, dual rostering can be an overload and obviously each family has to decide if dual rostering is workable. Many state associations place limits on dual rostering to avoid this. In North Carolina, players can play for two teams, but they cannot play for both teams on the same day. However, if it IS workable, should travel players still play Rec?
It’s a hard question to answer once you frame the question in terms of the things players learn and bad habits.
Playing rec ball as a travel player can lead to bad habits being reinforced. You go from being one of many good players on a team to being the only one or one of two or three good players. Now this is where coaching comes in. A good rec coach will work to ensure their travel kids don’t play superstar and instead utilize them in positions that benefit both them and the team. A common practice is to have them play defense or midfield to help ‘control’ the match while feeding up to the learning forwards. Sure, once in a while they’ll see a lane and go for it, but for the most part, you ensure they are part of the team.
The problem is, not all rec coaches will do this and some will abuse their dual rostered players using them just to rack up goals. If you let them play superstar, they learn bad habits (not passing) and the rest of the team just watches. Fortunately in our league we’ve seen coaches properly develop their travel AND reec kids instead of leveraging the travel kids for goals. But it still can be a problem.
So the Question of the Week is:
Should Travel Players Be Allowed To Play On Rec Teams?
I’m curious to hear from parents and coaches who have had dual rostered players and how it went. I have two this season and have found it a challenge to coach, but overall I think it’s a benefit to both the team and the dual rostered players. They really enjoy playing with their old teammates and helping teach them some new things. My son plays on two teams and the thing he really enjoys is the opportunity to play in positions he might not play on his travel team like rear defense or keeper. I move him around just like any of my other kids so everyone gets experience at all positions.
Have you coached travel kids in Rec? What have you encountered? As a parent of a dual rostered player – was it worth it? Is it more common to see rec coaches who take advantage of the travel kids to their detriment or do they integrate them and strengthen the team while ensuring EVERYone continues to improve?

February 11th, 2009 at 10:07 am
I know this post is a couple of years old now, but I’m going through these same questions. My daughter who plays U11 competitive is asking to play spring Rec soccer this spring.
Part of me says it’s ok, she’ll get more touches on ball, as well as being able to play different positions (she’s just learning to play keeper, and Rec would be a nice way to work into it). Also, the Rec game slows down, so hopefully she’d be able to practice more of the things she’s learning with the traveling team.
The friend I coach with doesn’t let his daughter play Rec at the same time, as he is concerned about her picking up bad habits in Rec.
Haven’t decided yet. We may confer with some of the other players too. Some kids just love to play, and our traveling teams don’t practice as much as some of the bigger clubs (some are near year-round), so the extra time on ball may be what makes the decision.
February 24th, 2009 at 8:12 am
It really depends on the level of teams in your Rec program and how your child plays. I had four or five dual rostered kids one season (our first season of travel as a league and our only season of dual rostering) So they didn’t pick up as many bad habits because they had a couple peers on the team. But overall, most of our coaches felt the kids were picking up bad habits and it was too much. My own child LOVES to play and enjoyed playing Rec – because he got to show off a bit. But I don’t think it helped his overall development. Really what made it worth it was unique to that team and what it accomplished that year. Had he not been in that situation, dual rostering probably wouldn’t have been worth it. I know his travel coaches felt it was affecting him in a negative way.
Our travel league doesn’t allow dual rostering, but one local league has an unaffiliated Rec program, so they can dual roster and a LOT of the kids do.
From the opposite angle – you have to consider the impact on the other Rec players. Will it hurt their development because the travel kids always hog the ball or will it help them because they have a peer than can show them things. I’ve found it depends on the coach and it takes a coach who will reign in the horses to let the rest get ball touches and improve.
At this point, even if our travel league allowed dual rostering, I’d probably recommend our Rec league continue to disallow it.