<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Floods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Youth Soccer from a Soccer Dad, Fan, Coach and Administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike&#8217;s WordPress Plugins &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WordPress 2.1 and Xinha4WP</title>
		<link>http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/comment-page-1/#comment-35677</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike&#8217;s WordPress Plugins &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WordPress 2.1 and Xinha4WP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/#comment-35677</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress 2.1 is coming and there are some changes for plugins to deal with. Looking at what is changing and the Xinha4WP code, I don&#8217;t see any reason why Xinha4WP would not work on WordPress 2.1. I haven&#8217;t had a chance to install the 2.1 Alpha release and test yet (too busy fighting the spam floods), but I&#8217;m 99% sure it&#8217;ll be good to go. If any of you happen to be playing with 2.1, let me know if Xinha4WP works for you. I&#8217;d like to get it listed on the compatible page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress 2.1 is coming and there are some changes for plugins to deal with. Looking at what is changing and the Xinha4WP code, I don&#8217;t see any reason why Xinha4WP would not work on WordPress 2.1. I haven&#8217;t had a chance to install the 2.1 Alpha release and test yet (too busy fighting the spam floods), but I&#8217;m 99% sure it&#8217;ll be good to go. If any of you happen to be playing with 2.1, let me know if Xinha4WP works for you. I&#8217;d like to get it listed on the compatible page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soccer Dad</title>
		<link>http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/comment-page-1/#comment-17373</link>
		<dc:creator>Soccer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/#comment-17373</guid>
		<description>Yup. I run Bad Behavior 2 and Spam Karma 2 w/Akismet. BB2 seems to catch about 25% of the hits. The rest get through and hit SK2 and Akismet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. I run Bad Behavior 2 and Spam Karma 2 w/Akismet. BB2 seems to catch about 25% of the hits. The rest get through and hit SK2 and Akismet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quix0r</title>
		<link>http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/comment-page-1/#comment-17372</link>
		<dc:creator>Quix0r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onthepitch.org/2006/12/14/spam-floods/#comment-17372</guid>
		<description>Did you try BB2? When you turn off logging it&#039;s a database-less generic filter against bad bots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try BB2? When you turn off logging it&#8217;s a database-less generic filter against bad bots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
